9/11

Wednesday, 11 August 2021 23:05

Building 7 (WTC7)

Written by 911Truth
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Building 7 occupied a city block immediately north of the World Trade Center complex.

WTC 1 through WTC 6 were on the superblock bounded by West, Church, Liberty, and Vesey Streets. Building 7 was wedged between the Verizon and U.S. Post Office buildings across Vesey Street from the WTC complex. It straddled an electrical substation that filled the first two stories of about half the block.

People who have heard of Building 7 tend to assume that 'ancillary damage' from the collapse of the Twin Towers had something to do with Building 7's collapse. It is important to note that Building 7 was no closer to the towers than any of several other large buildings outside of the WTC complex. The wall of Building 7 closest to the WTC complex was more than 300 feet from the nearest wall of the North Tower. It appears that most of the heavy fallout from the destruction of the North Tower landed short of Building 7. Building 6 stood between the North Tower and Building 7.

 

Building 7 was the only of the seven buildings with a World Trade Center address that was on a different block. It, along with the 6 other buildings, was completely or largely destroyed on September 11th. No large buildings outside of the two turquoise zones on the map to the right suffered more than superficial damage, such as gashes caused by flying pieces of steel from the Towers.

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

UK Man Wins Court Case Against BBC For 9-11 WTC 7 Cover Up

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day. So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee. For all intents and purposes, a UK court has just ruled that the BBC was complicit in the September 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States. Fantastic. A small victory but a huge symbolic victory and one you would have never otherwise have heard of. So I suggest to you the reader get the word out on this one. Spread it far and wide.

This is big if only symbolic. UK Man Wins Court Case Against BBC For 9-11 WTC 7 Cover-Up (See video below)

 

 

Read 307 times Last modified on Thursday, 02 June 2022 22:04

Media

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

About this site and why it was started.

If there were just one, or maybe even 2 things that happened on, or before 9/11 2001 that seemed strange or coincidental, I would believe what The 911 Commission and other government agencies have told us about that event.

However, there are so many coincidences that just "happened" on that day, that they can not be ignored. I have spent over 21 years, doing my best to weed through all the "Conspiracies" and facts but mostly lies. I will try to convey a better understanding of what did in fact happen on 911 and you can make your own decisions, I know, most of you have made up your mind about what happened that day, but please, with an open mind, read some (or all) of the posts and come to a conclusion, that just may be different than the one you have now.